Cari Blog Ini

Catatan acara Indonesian Day, 10 Desember 2015

Catatan acara Indonesian Day, 10 Desember 2015


Waktu
Agenda
14.15
MC memulai acara
14.18
Sambutan pertama dari ketua International Office HSE (Marina)
14.22
Sambutan kedua dari ketua kegiatan Indonesia day (Resiyaman)
14.24
Tarian Daerah
14.28
Kuliah Umum ‘Indonesia-Russia’ oleh Duta Besar RI untuk Russia dan Belorussia
Point 1. World Economy and Indonesia Economy
Point 2. 11 Reason to do business in Indonesia
Point 3. Wonderful Indonesia
Point 5. Prospective Cooperation (Railways, energy, nuclear etc)
Point 6. ASEAN and Russia
Point 7. Sochi, Russia-ASEAN Meeting 2016
Point 7. ASEAN Role in regions
15.00
Q & A
1.       O. Volosyuk. Pelajar Indonesia di Indonesia
Jawab : Increased, Moscow, Peter and Samara as the biggest
2.       Sizova. Russian Culture in Indonesia
Jawab : Panon Hideung dan Mahasiswa, sekarang beberapa universitas memiliki studi rusia dan Russian Students yang banyak
3.       Marina I.O. Indonesian Student role after graduated from Russia
Jawab : Military role in Old generation, Government and Private in new generation. We have 10 diplomat in Moscow, graduated from Russian Universities.
4.       ???. Indonesia Culture
Jawab : Asia and Oceania (Melanesia people)  
15.10
Q & A
5.       Ratya. Indonesia-Russia in SBY Era
Jawab : Field cooperation in High-tech, Infrastructure, Mining, Furniture
Most of my career is in the UN. Bebas Aktif in international relations, Russia-China-Indonesia and West-Indonesia
6.       ???. Possibility Indonesia join BRICS
Jawab : Lets BRICS maintain his relations and Indonesia have MIKTA (Mexico, Indonesia, Korea, Turkey and Australia) and Development 8
World is developing & Change. Major power and  developing Countries
7.       ???. Challenges ASEAN & China Relations
Jawab : ASEAN-China relations in good condition. For South China Seas “Battle in talk 1000 days is better than 1 day war”
8.       Wai Yan. Indonesia opinion about Myanmar & Why Indonesia Silent in SCS
Jawab :  Indonesia did constructive engagement in Myanmar. We avoid megaphone diplomacy, about election and Human Right, PM of Myanmar satisfied and say thanks to Indonesia role
In SCS, we are not claimant state, Dialogue in Bali is our effort, DOC, COD, 10 years ago. Indonesia sure that SCS is sea for cooperation
9.       Sidikova. Russian Image in Indonesia
Jawab : Just see Indonesian media, Russia image from media and commentator 80-90% is positive comment. Also Indonesia-Russian journalist more and more to share
10.   Ekaterina I.O. Most Popular countries for Indonesia Students
Jawab : US, Australia, England and Netherland. Russia 300s
11.   ???. International student in Indonesia
Jawab : China, Australia and 60s from Russia   
15.48
Olga Volosyuk Cometary Indonesian Student contribution in class.  
15.49
Pertanyaan dan hadiah oleh Duta Besar RI untuk Russia dan Belorussia
1.       Menlu Indonesia
2.       Mendag Russia
3.       Indonesia Presiden
4.       Menlu Russia
5.       Russia Council
6.       Juara the voice of Russia
15. 56
Menyanyikan lagu Rayuan Pulau Kelapa Indonesia-Russia


Opini :
Indonesia selalu memiliki scenario yang luar biasa dalam menghadapi politik internasional. Posisi Indonesia sejak era Sukarno, dalam ASEAN, MIKTA, sengketa SCS adalah informasi baru yang saya dapatkan. Scenario cadangan yang digunakan juga tidak menyebabkan posisi Indonesia jatuh.

Hubungan Indonesia dan Rusia juga mengarah pada scenario yang semakin baik. Indonesia dan Rusia adalah teman yang baik dalam berbagai kerjasama. Politik Indonesia yang konsisten dalam posisi bebas aktif merupakan peluang memulai kerjasama regional dan global yang cerah. 

The Egyptianization of Historical Writing (1881 – 1951)

#IndonesiaHSERU

Ada beberapa video yang bisa kita tampilkan untuk menunjukan Indonesia



1. Pertama tentang Indonesia menyambut dengan Free Visa, durasi 30 detik

2. Tentang Selayang pandang Indonesia dari situs wisata yang bisa dikatakan netral, durasi 2 menit 40 detik
Tambahan jika dibutuhkan
3. Indonesia Country Profile, durasi 4 menit

4. Indonesia cultural heritage versi Kementerian, durasi 3.50s
5. MY LIFE MY ADVENTURE, durasi 5 menit

#IndonesiaHSERU
catatan
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I9MnkkRRtxk Indonesia free visa
durasi 30s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sOLlsQ98hvg indonesia travel guide mojo
durasi 2.40s
tambahan
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SWk9gCKEkgw indonesia country profile
durasi 4 menit
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XrdVOE-WR9o culture heritage
durasi 3.50s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JIEz2Mk5UoA our adventure home
durasi 5menit

draft coursework

Indonesia’s Foreign Policy toward the People Republic of China
In the South China Sea 2009-2014

or

Indonesia’s Foreign Policy toward ASEAN Countries
In the South China Sea 2009-2014



A.   Abstract
This coursework analyzes Indonesia's foreign policy toward the PRC in the South China Sea 2009-2014. The purpose of this study is to analyze why Indonesia did constructive engagement in the South China Sea Disputes in 2009-2014? This coursework uses primary and secondary data, the data will be analyzed with a descriptive analysis. Researchers found that Indonesia's foreign policy towards China is attractive because Indonesia did constructive engagement, while Indonesia is also involved in the dispute as some ASEAN countries in Natuna Seas-Indonesia and 9 dashed line seas-PRC.
This research uses concept of national interest and framework of the foreign policy that arrangement by Holsti and Rosenau. From the analysis, the researchers concluded that Indonesia undertake constructive engagement based on internal and external factors. Significantly, the internal factors that influence are the democratization in Indonesia. While external factors affecting Indonesia is participation in the ASEAN.
B.   Research Question
Why Indonesia did constructive engagement in the South China Sea Disputes in 2009-2014?
C.   Aim and Objective
·         Exploring stages of development of Indonesia's foreign policy as well as distinctive features of each year in in the South China Sea disputes 2009-2014.
·         Highlighting special features of relations between Indonesia, ASEAN Countries and China in the South China Sea disputes 2009-2014.




Primary Resources
China’s National Defense in 2010. (2011). Beijing, ROC: The Information office of China’s State Council
China’s Peaceful Development. (2011). Beijing, ROC: The Information office of China’s State Council.
Government Regulation Republic of Indonesia No. 41, 2010-Indonesia Defence Policy 2010-2014 (Peraturan Presiden Republik Indonesia No. 41, 2010-Kebijakan Umum Pertahanan Negara Tahun 2010-2014). (2010). Jakarta, Indonesia: Sekretariat Negara Republik Indonesia.
M.G. Dadi, S. (2007). Indonesia Defense Diplomacy Current Challenges Internal and External. Jakarta, Indonesia: Presentation, Institute for Defense and Strategic Studies.
Natalegawa, Marty M. (2011). Statement by Minister for Foreign Affairs Republic of Indonesia at United Nations General Assembly. New York, USA: Ministerial Speech, UN General Assembly
Yudhonono, Susilo Bambang. (2011). Opening Speech ASEAN Summit 2011. Jakarta, Indonesia: Presidential Speech, ASEAN Summit 2011.
Secondary Resources
Thesis and Disertation
Ariffien, Nurul F Z, “Upaya Diplomatik Indonesia Terhadap China dalam menyelesaikan potensi konflik Landas Kontinen Natuna di Laut China Selatan”, Departemen Hubungan Internasional FISIP Universitas Mulawarman, 2014
Book
Bayne, Nicholas and Stephen Woolcock (Editor), Colin Budd (Editor), “The New Economic Diplomacy: Decision-Making and Negotiation in International Economic Relations”, London: Ashgate Pub Ltd ,April 2003
Bergsten, C. Fred, C. Freeman & Nicholas R. Lardy. “China's Rise: Challenges and Opportunities”, Washington : Peterson Institute for international economic, 2008.
Couloumbis, Theodore dan James H.Wolfe, “Introduction to International Relation: Power and Justice”. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 1990
Hiebert, Murray and friends, “Perspectives on the South China Sea, Diplomatic, Legal, and Security Dimensions of the Dispute”. Washington : CSIS, 2014 
Holsti, K. J, “International Politics: A Frame Work for Analysis”. New Jersey : Prentice-Hall International, 1992
Jemadu, Aleksius, “Politik Global dalam teori dan praktik”. Yogyakarta : Graha Ilmu, 2008
Nainggolan, Poltak Partogi, “Konflik Laut China Selatan dan Implikasinya Terhadap Kawasan”. Jakarta : P3DI Setjen DPR Republik Indonesia dan Azza Grafika, 2013
Olson, William C, “The Theory and Practice of International Relations”. USA : Prentice Hall International, 1990
Perwita, Anak Agung Banyu dan Yanyan Mochamad Yani, “Pengantar Ilmu Hubungan Internasional”. Bandung : PT. Remaja Rosdakarya, 2006
Xuetong, Yan, “Analysis of China’s National Interests”. California : James Martin CNS, 2002
Journal Article
Adnan, Adlyss Aldelya Mohd. “Realities of the Natalegawa Doctrine”, in Institute of Strategic and International Studies, Malaysia, June 2013
Gindarsih, Iis. “Indonesia and the South China Sea: A Two fold Strategy”, in RSIS Commentary, RSIS vol 158, Singapura, 2015
Guo, Sujian. “China's Peaceful Rise in the 21st Century: Domestic and International Conditions”, in The China Journal, Vol. 58, Juli 2007
Jiao, Liang, “China’s Rising Military Power & Its Implications”, in Asia Paper 2012, Institute for Security and Development Policy, Stockholm, 2012
Jisi, Wang. “PEACEFUL RISE: A DISCOURSE IN CHINA”, in School of International Studies, Peking University, Vol. May, 2006
Miskel, James F. “National Interests: Grand Purposes or Catchphrases?” in Naval War College Review, Vol. LV, No. 4, Rhode Island, 2002
Pattiradjawane, Rene L. “South China Sea Disputes: Sovereignty and Indonesian Foreign Policy”, in RSIS Commentary, RSIS vol 116, Singapura, 2015
Quintos, Mary Fides. “Artificial Islands in The South China Sea and Their Impact on Regional (In) Security”, in FSI Insight, CIRSS, vol ii, no 2, Manila, 2015
Sklenka, Stephen D. “Strategy, National Interest, and means to an End”, in Carlisle Paper in Security Strategy, SSI, 2007
Tisdell, Clem. “Economic Reform and Openness in China: China’s Development Policies in the Last 30 Years”, Economic Analysis & Policy, vol. 39 no. 2, Brisbane, 2009
Wirasuta, Dadang. “South China Sea Maritime Security : Chalengges and Oppurtunities”, Jurnal Pertahanan, Universitas Pertahanan Indonesia, vol.3 no 3, Jakarta 2013



Introduction
Theories
2 Dynamic tension in SCS (Actors Interest, Indonesia Interest)
3 Indonesia policy
Indonesia policy to asean countries in SCS (Diplomatic, Legal, Economic, Security)
Indonesia policy to global in SCS
4. Factor of foreign policy
Internal

External 

Written Exam Historiography

Module I. Written Exam. Question Block I.
Please answer as fully as possible, providing examples, if necessary.
Question 1: The definition of science and scientific research. Scientific knowledge and scientific method.
Question 2: Transformation of historiography in India in the nineteenth century. Colonial historiography; the emergence of a modern historical consciousness .
Answer

Etymologically, definition of science is gotten from the Latin word scientia meaning knowledge. Science is knowledge to learning in any area that using "the scientific method". Science can be assembled into two categories: natural science and social sciences.
Natural science is the science of naturally occurring objects or phenomena. Natural sciences can be classified into physical sciences, earth sciences, life sciences, and others. Physical sciences consist of physics (the science of physical objects), chemistry (the science of matter), and astronomy (the science of celestial objects). Earth sciences, Life sciences and other also consist from different focus sciences.
In contrast, social science is the science of people or collections of people, economic, politic, social and psychology. Social sciences can be classified into psychology (the science of human behaviors), sociology (the science of social groups), and economics (the science of firms, markets, and economies).
Sciences can also be classified based on their purpose. Basic sciences (physics, mathematics, and biology), and the second one is Applied sciences, engineering (physics+ chemistry), medicine (chemistry+ biology) etc.
Scientific research is research analysing data related to contribute with a body of science, and follows the scientific method.
Scientific method refers to a standardized set of techniques for building scientific knowledge, such as how to make valid observations, how to interpret results, and how to generalize those results. The scientific method must satisfy four characteristics: Replicability, Precision, Falsifiability and Parsimony
Scientific knowledge is refers to a generalized body of laws and theories to explain a phenomenon or behaviour of interest that are acquired using the scientific method. Scientists will analyse and interpret their data, hypotheses, theories, and results also review other scientist in context of scientific knowledge.
Four factors as scientific knowledge:
1) independent and testing,
2) peer review and publication,
3) measurement of actual or potential rate of error
4) degree of acceptance within the scientific community.


nomor2
In South India in nineteenth century there was a tradition of historical writing that in significant ways conformed to historical genre. it was forms as prose and poetry with Mughal Persian historiography that narrow political focus, decline of Mughal power and later with the new political presence of the East India Company.
This Mughal Persian historiography was fundamentally about moral of India. Ghulam Hussain Tabatabai (1727), author Seir Mutaqherin (1781) also aware of the differences in the political culture of the East Indian Company (EIC), and this engendered a new political and historical consciousness.
The basic commodity of EIC from india were Tea, salt, cotton, silk and opium. For maintain this commerce EIC needed to made maritime fleet, armies, and diplomat. For reach this goal, In the beginning of the nineteenth century, EIC started to write Indian histories.
There is two types of historical writing from EIC, The first is written by British servants of the Company or called as administrative historical narratives. The administrator historians, such as James Mill, he has position as Chief Examiner of Correspondence in London, he wrote histories of India but never even set foot in India, and other one is Sir Henry Elliot that write History of India as told by Indian historian.
The second genre was represented mainly by Bengali Hindu literati (pandits, or scholars) commissioned by the Company College at Fort William, Calcutta, to write history texts as language primers.
Three of the pandits’ works that come to our attention are Ramram Basu with Raja Pratapaditya Charita (The Story of King Pratapaditya, 1801), Rajiblochan Mukhopadhyay’s with Maharaj Krishnachandra Rayasya Charitram (The Life of King Krishnachandra, 1805) and Mritunjoy Bidyalankar with Rajabali (Chronicle of Kings, 1808). Nor did the book show any awareness of the concept of nation, because the protagonists were gods and kings.

However, in the next few decades Indian historical writing was demythologized and rationalized. An important reason for this change was that colonialism used history to justify its rule: the arguments of good governance, civilizing mission etc. were used to contrast with a deplorable precolonial past. Indian history was taught in the missionary schools, colleges and also in the newer vernacular Schools that were created to train the clerks and servants of the Empire. These modern schools, which gradually displaced the traditional tols, pathshalas (elementary school) and madrasas, emphasized a curriculum aligned with colonial educational values.
Further, since the colonialist narratives ascribed the British presence in India to the reason of history itself, it became necessary to produce a counter-mythology to invalidate this assertion. One important metanarrative to emerge contrasted a materialistic West with a spiritual East; although the West would have its moment, history would end with the triumph of the Indian spirit.

This role began for religious revivalism from Indian Hindu and Indian Islam. Latter Hindu, Islam and British presence make new identity of modern India. Indian can compare its civilization with Greek,  Roman empire, Muslim empire and medieval Europe. This discourse made indian nationalism and good economic wellbeing of Indian people. 

Science and Scientific Research


What is research? Depending on who you ask, you will likely get very different answers to this seemingly simple question.
-          Some people will say that they routinely research different online websites to find the best place to buy goods or services they want.
-          Television news channels supposedly conduct research in the form of viewer polls on topics of public interest such as forthcoming elections or government-funded projects.
-          Undergraduate students research the Internet to find the information they need to complete assigned projects or term papers.
-          Graduate students working on research projects for a professor may see research as collecting or analyzing data related to their project.
-          Businesses and consultants research different potential solutions to organizational problems or to identify customer purchase patterns.
However, none of the above can be considered “scientific research” unless: (1) it contributes to a body of science, and (2) it follows the scientific method.

Science
What is science? To some, science refers to difficult high school or college-level courses such as physics, chemistry, and biology meant only for the brightest students. To others, science is a craft practiced by scientists in white coats using specialized equipment in their laboratories. Etymologically, the word “science” is derived from the Latin word scientia meaning knowledge. Science refers to a systematic and organized body of knowledge in any area of inquiry that is acquired using “the scientific method” (which we will discuss later). Science can be grouped into two broad categories: natural science and social science.

Natural science is the science of naturally occurring objects or phenomena, such as light, objects, matter, earth, celestial bodies, or the human body. Natural sciences can be further classified into physical sciences, earth sciences, life sciences, and others. Physical sciences consist of disciplines such as physics (the science of physical objects), chemistry (the science of matter), and astronomy (the science of celestial objects). Earth sciences consist of disciplines such as geology (the science of the earth). Life sciences include disciplines such as biology (the science of human bodies) and botany (the science of plants).
In contrast, social science is the science of people or collections of people, such as groups, firms, societies, or economies, and their individual or collective behaviors. Social sciences can be classified into disciplines such as psychology (the science of human behaviors), sociology (the science of social groups), and economics (the science of firms, markets, and economies).
Sciences can also be classified based on their purpose.
Basic sciences, also called pure sciences, are those that explain the most basic objects and forces, relationships between them, and laws governing them. Examples include physics, mathematics, and biology.
Applied sciences, also called practical sciences, are sciences that apply scientific knowledge from basic sciences in a physical environment. For instance, engineering is an applied science that applies the laws of physics and chemistry for practical applications such as building stronger bridges, while medicine is an applied science that applies the laws of biology for solving human ailments. Both basic and applied sciences are required for human development. However, applied sciences cannot stand on their own right, but instead relies on basic sciences for its progress.

Scientific Knowledge

The purpose of science is to create scientific knowledge. Scientific knowledge refers to a generalized body of laws and theories to explain a phenomenon or behaviour of interest that are acquired using the scientific method.
As scientists analyze and interpret their data, they generate hypotheses, theories, or laws, which help explain their results and place them in context of the larger body of scientific knowledge.
These different kinds of explanations are tested by scientists through additional experiments, observations, modelling, and theoretical studies. Thus, the body of scientific knowledge builds on previous ideas and is constantly growing. It is deliberately shared with colleagues through the process of peer review, where scientists comment on each other's work, and then through publication in the scientific literature, where it can be evaluated and integrated into the body of scientific knowledge by the larger community.

So, four factors are essential to the classification of an item of information as scientific knowledge:
1) independent and rigorous testing,
2) peer review and publication,
3) measurement of actual or potential rate of error
4) degree of acceptance within the scientific community.

And this is not the end: One of the hallmarks of scientific knowledge is that it is subject to change, as new data are collected and reinterpretations of existing data are made. Major theories, which are supported by multiple lines of evidence, are rarely completely changed, but new data and tested explanations add nuance and detail.

Scientific method

Scientific method refers to a standardized set of techniques for building scientific knowledge, such as how to make valid observations, how to interpret results, and how to generalize those results. The scientific method allows researchers to independently and impartially test pre-existing theories and prior findings, and subject them to open debate, modifications, or enhancements. The scientific method must satisfy four characteristics:
Replicability: Others should be able to independently replicate or repeat a scientific study and obtain similar, if not identical, results.
Precision: Theoretical concepts, which are often hard to measure, must be defined with such precision that others can use those definitions to measure those concepts and test that theory.
Falsifiability: A theory must be stated in a way that it can be disproven. Theories that cannot be tested or falsified are not scientific theories and any such knowledge is not scientific knowledge. A theory that is specified in imprecise terms or whose concepts are not accurately measurable cannot be tested, and is therefore not scientific. Sigmund Freud’s ideas on psychoanalysis fall into this category and is therefore not considered a “theory”, even though psychoanalysis may have practical utility in treating certain types of ailments.
Parsimony: When there are multiple explanations of a phenomenon, scientists must always accept the simplest or logically most economical explanation. This concept is called parsimony or “Occam’s razor.” Parsimony prevents scientists from pursuing overly complex or outlandish theories with endless number of concepts and relationships that may explain a little bit of everything but nothing in particular.

The scientific method, as applied to social sciences, includes a variety of research approaches, tools, and techniques, such as qualitative and quantitative data, statistical analysis, experiments, field surveys, case research, and so forth. However, one should recognize that the scientific method operates primarily at the empirical level of research, i.e., how to make observations and analyze and interpret these observations. Very little of this method is directly pertinent to the theoretical level, which is really the more challenging part of scientific research.

The term ‘socio-political research’
‘Socio-political’ means ‘relating to, or involving a combination of social and political factors’.
Examples of socio-political issues
An example of a contemporary socio-political issue in the United States is the issue of gun control. Citizens are conflicted about whether private citizens should be allowed to own guns. That conflict has expanded into government in the form of existing and impending regulations about gun ownership.
Another example of a socio-political issue in Western Europe nowadays is immigration. The question of who should be allowed to live in certain states of Western Europe as well as why and how has a direct impact on the European society. But it is not only a social problem – it is also a political question, since it is the government and other political institutions that play a role in determining who can legally live in this or that European State.
Socio-political context plays a critical role on the global stage as well. War is often the result of not just political conflict, but social conflict as well.

So when we speak of socio-political studies we usually speak of studies that are taking into consideration both social and political factors. This why we can speak of socio-political research as of interdisciplinary research – since it combines political science and sociology or social science. Thus, we can speak, for example, of a political sociology.

When we speak of sociology in general we mean the academic study of social behaviour, including its origins, development, organization, and institutions. It is a social science that uses various methods of empirical investigation and critical analysis to develop a body of knowledge about social order, social disorder and social change.

Contemporary political sociology involves, but is not limited to, the study of the relations between state, society and citizens. Where a typical research question in political sociology might have been: “Why do so few American or European citizens choose to vote?” or even, “What difference does it make if women get elected?”, political sociologists also now ask: “How are emotions relevant to global poverty?” or "What difference does knowledge make to democracy?". The opening up of political sociology does not mean that old topics have been discarded. Traditionally there were four main areas of research in the field of political sociology:
1.     The socio-political formation of the modern state;
2.     “Who rules?” How social inequality between groups (class, race, gender, etc.) influences politics;
3.     How public opinion, ideologies, personalities, social movements and trends outside of the formal institutions of political power affect formal politics;
4.     Power relationships within and between social groups (families, workplaces, bureaucracy, media, etc.).
In other words, political sociology was traditionally concerned with how social trends, dynamics, and structures of domination affect formal political processes, as well as exploring how various social forces work together to change political policies. Political sociology still takes these questions seriously, but it is now more concerned with the play of power and politics across societies, which includes, but is not restricted to, relations between the state and society.
In part, this is a product of the growing complexity of social relations, the impact of social movement organising, and the relative weakening of the state as a result of globalization. In large part, however, it is due to the radical rethinking of social theory. This is as much focused now on micro questions (such as the formation of identity through social interaction), as it is on macro questions (such as how to capture and use state power).

Chief influences here include cultural studies (Stuart Hall), post-structuralism (Michel Foucault, Judith Butler), pragmatism (Luc Boltanski), structuration theory (Anthony Giddens), and cultural sociology (Jeffrey C. Alexander).